Before the internet... Discussions from chats or forums, were attempted. A discussion including the odd subject-matter of "coils wound upon coils" was attempted through postal mail and a pen-pal conversation was found which eventually brought a photocopy of a 1936 image. Decades later I found a much better rationalized source for the subject-matter, rather than the very limited presentation in the first image below.

2025 Update: Missing was reference or any awareness of the 1878 drawing of 'spirellae' from E.D. Babbitt: The idea of coiled - coils had already been published in the 1800s. Having found this only in 2025, through a concentrated reading of a 1919 book by CHARLES W. LEADBEATER titled: OCCULT CHEMISTRY Clairvoyant Observations on the Chemical Elements, 1919. (collaborating with ANNIE BESANT, p.t.s). The still earlier reference to the 1878 PRINCIPLES LIGHT AND COLOR (+) BY EDWIN D. BABBITT. Both feature the "coil wound on coil" principle, with application to atomic matter, (of earlier authors), and were respected outside of the commercialist branches of science and physics.

As a young seeker of alternative sources for knowledge, the overall structural picture was always sought for first. (Visual structuration before hypothesis, before apparatus, before method, to orient an objectivity). The emotional urge from visualization energized the artistry of modeling out ideas in a physical form.

Stray glimpses of concepts had involved spirals.-- Only very limited access to specialized libraries was possible in those days, within a low income rural lifestyle. Some of the old fragments of aether theory provided concepts to sort through, but only in small doses until the internet resources slowly expanded (after year 2000).

My snail-mail penpal of the 1990s had conjectured some concepts, as a model for the tachyon or neutrino, or elementary particles mentioned in physics of that time, (admitting of little background for that). Wildly speculative ideas about science provoked curiosity, but lacked systematic development. This provided contrasting soundings of where commercialized science rejected aether concepts, (of having a 'dynamic' or flowing quality).

Lesage's "ultra mundane particle"  came up. Adding up to three untraditional terms which somewhat could suggest a 'primal' force. Gillette's 'ultimote', The Urantia Book 'ultimaton' and varieties of "push gravity". Was there some sort of primal force flowing through and past us? Could it be tapped or harnessed, somehow? Such thoughts ease the menial labor of life. The notion of discovering a new source of energy was appealing. Perhaps it could be found as a dynamic aether, but when internet discussion on related ideas were found, the many published ideas proved daunting.

Decades later a more provoking presentation titled Energy Wave Theory, later on grasped this stream of thought and this more conventional study took as many years to reason through with 3D examples. This encouraged a geometric effort spurred by EWT.

There gradually came much more inspiration from what had seemed to be lost arts, but was actually a reticent source of knowledge, with tenable explanations of all existence. This was not readily translatable by physics and sciences, but some scientists have at least alluded to mankind's incomplete range of perceptions, and so one can leave it there, until more is perceived.

Relatively, non material, or pre-material forces continued drawing thought towards a somewhat static, pressure metaphor at the human scale of perceptions, perhaps including gravity itself, sensed and fully affecting us while decidedly unnoticed moment to moment, taken for granted. There may be faster unseen motions in gravity, as a continuing flow. "In compressible pressure" which aggregates matter concentrically into particles, so far unspoken in the official academics. As of the late 1990s, very little was placed on the primitive, public internet. Would 3D models serve rationalizations? The early 3D CAD modeling below explored the concept of primal force, perpetual motion energizing matter-energy. Could this sustain particulate matter?

 

(Above Image: Surprisingly done in a 1995s CAD app, the above 3D model aligned the spiraling objects to geodesic faces. This was inspired by Synergetics (of Bucky Fuller), who suggested the word 'isotropic' and which inspired a daring application to the idea of forces molding together a state of matter, constituting the physical world for human perception. 

Compiling names of theories was not the point, rather the corresponding geometry was explored to visualize conceptual potentials, where hypotheses and theories might fit together for discussion. I came across the Expanding Earth Hypothesis, in the early days of the internet. (Around 1999 there was a website with the original writings, no?). In essence, a theory suggesting that the planet earth  actually "accumulates matter", and therefore grows. Did this include other planets and suns? Dare one ask if it otherwise just energizes physicality? This was intriguing.